Pricing is based on the proof gap you need to fix first.
Truzzel is scoped around workflow pain, rollout size, and operational complexity. We do not force a real operational proof problem into fake software tiers just to make the pricing page look familiar.
Why pricing is not one-size-fits-all
Receiving-to-batch proof reconstruction is different from a broader release-control rollout. Supplier evidence complexity varies. Audit and proof-response needs vary. Pilot scope and implementation depth vary. Pricing should reflect the workflow you need to fix first, not seat-count theater.
How most teams start
Most teams begin with a focused pilot around receiving-to-batch reconciliation, release-blocking evidence gaps, or supplier evidence workflow. That creates a measurable first win before expanding into broader trust-control workflows.
Focused Pilot
For teams fixing one painful proof workflow first and wanting a measurable first result instead of a giant transformation project.
Operational Rollout
For teams expanding from a pilot into broader release-control, proof-response, and exception-closure workflows.
Multi-Workflow Expansion
For teams extending into supplier proof, audit packets, and wider trust-control coverage across the operation.
What pricing is based on
Which proof problem you are fixing first and how deep that workflow goes.
How messy the supplier evidence, release path, and proof chain are today.
Pilot, focused deployment, or broader multi-workflow expansion.
How much support, configuration, and workflow shaping is needed to get a real result.
Request a demo and we will scope the right starting point.
The point of the first conversation is not to drag you through a generic sales call. It is to understand where proof breaks today, what the first wedge should be, and whether a focused pilot makes sense.